This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by RADELET, M. L. Articles by ROBERTS, L. M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Parole Interviews of Sex Offenders

The Role of Impression Management

LEIGH M. ROBERTS

This study investigates the role of impression management in parole interviews and the question of how parole boards interpret what they see as managed impressions. Observations were made of 166 male sex offenders in 236 parole interviews, and detailed interviews were conducted with parole board members. The results indicate that although parole board members believe impression management occurs in all parole interviews, the issue of the veracity of the candidates in presenting themselves rarely arises. Instead, the candidate's self-presentation is most often interpreted as a reflection of his self-conception, which may or may not correspond with the board's construction of the candidate's "true" self. Furthermore, rather than routinely dismissing impression management as a deceptive camouflage that obstructs accurate appraisals of the candidate's future behavior, in some cases the board sees the ability to develop competent impression management skills as a positive asset to have in adjusting to the outside community, and therefore actually encourages some candidates to develop their impression management skills further.

Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, Vol. 12, No. 2, 140-161 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/0098303983012002002


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?