Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schillinger, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Dependency, Control, and Isolation

Battered Women and the Welfare System

Elisabeth Schillinger

Shelters for victims of domestic violence, established by grassroots activists and feminists in the late 1960s and early 1970s, have been coopted by federal, state, and local welfare agencies in recent years. While the expropriation has resulted in greater visibility and funding, it has also perverted many of the goals and philosophies of the early movement by inflicting bureaucratic controls on battering victims. Interviews with shelter residents in a small southwestern city revealed that in seeking to appeal to power-wielding bureaucrats, battering victims develop economic, legal, and psychological dependencies upon the welfare establishment. The domestic violence shelter may serve not only as a haven from abusive males but also as a funnel into a paternalistic social institution. The process of "agencization" can reduce clients' autonomy, retard the development of self-worth, and discourage victims from seeking reinforcement from mutual-support networks.

Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, Vol. 16, No. 4, 469-490 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/0891241688164003
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Violence Against WomenHome page
A. M. Moe
Silenced Voices and Structured Survival: Battered Women's Help Seeking
Violence Against Women, July 1, 2007; 13(7): 676 - 699.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 AffiliaHome page
H. Itzhaky and A. B. Porat
Battered Women in Shelters: Internal Resources, Well-Being, and Integration
Affilia, February 1, 2005; 20(1): 39 - 51.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Contemporary EthnographyHome page
D. L. Stephens, R. P. Hill, and J. W. Gentry
A Consumer-Behavior Perspective on Intimate Partner Violence
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, February 1, 2005; 34(1): 36 - 67.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Violence Against WomenHome page
D. A. DONNELLY, K. J. COOK, and L. A. WILSON
Provision and Exclusion: The Dual Face of Services to Battered Women in Three Deep South States
Violence Against Women, July 1, 1999; 5(7): 710 - 741.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 AffiliaHome page
C. J. Geissinger, M. M. Lazzari, M. J. Porter, and S. L. Tungate
Rural Women and Isolation: Pathways to Reconnection
Affilia, October 1, 1993; 8(3): 277 - 299.
[Abstract] [PDF]