Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ALDRIDGE, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

NEGOTIATING STATUS

Social Scientists and Anglican Clergy

ALAN ALDRIDGE

The clergy of the Church of England are members of an ancient and elite profession. although the legal privileges enjoyed by the Established Church have dwindled, its cultural influence remains extensive. The Church is central to national and civil religion; bishops enjoy high social status, which diffuses to rank-and-file clergy; and clergy themselves have high professional autonomy. In this article, conventional studies of social mobility—which have accorded significantly lower status to clergymen than to university academics—are criticized for conceptualizing social status in a manner that misses its fluid, multivalent, and context-dependent character. In their historical development, the clerical and academic professions in England have been highly congruent, so that clergy typically see themselves as members of the same professional milieu as university faculty. This taken-for-granted assumption profoundly influences the research relationship between social scientists and clergy. Gaining access, achieving rapport, and adopting an appropriate research methodology to elicit high-quality responses from informants involve the researcher in negotiating the status relationship to achieve a mutually agreed mix of acceptance and deference.

Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, Vol. 22, No. 1, 97-112 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/089124193022001007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Social Science InformationHome page
B. P. Bowser
Ethnography of racial identities in Paris: public indicators of social hierarchy. A research note
Social Science Information, December 1, 2007; 46(4): 591 - 605.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qualitative ResearchHome page
N. Stephens
Collecting data from elites and ultra elites: telephone and face-to-face interviews with macroeconomists
Qualitative Research, May 1, 2007; 7(2): 203 - 216.
[Abstract] [PDF]