Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HALLETT, T.
Right arrow Articles by FINE, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Ethnography 1900

Learning from the Field Research of an Old Century

TIM HALLETT

Northwestern University

GARY ALAN FINE

Northwestern University

Ethnographic research has changed dramatically over the past century, as a review of research published in the American Journal of Sociology from 1895 to 1910 attests. After describing the characteristics of that research and the scholars who published it, the authors analyze what has changed. This examination of ethnographic research suggests that despite methodological and theoretical advances over the past century, some traits of those earlier studies have been lost in contemporary field research. Specifically, the authors point to the loss of clarity, authority, and confidence in much current research. Ethnographers of a century ago believed that they were able to picture social scenes, deal with public problems, and provide ameliorative solutions. Moreover, they spoke with confidence and authority, an authority that is now downplayed in ethnographic research.

Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, Vol. 29, No. 5, 593-617 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/089124100129024016


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Contemporary EthnographyHome page
T. Hallett, G. Jeffers, and E. Bowman
There's Something About Annie: Rejoinder to Deegan, Hill, and Wortmann's Comment on MacLean
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, December 1, 2009; 38(6): 666 - 676.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Contemporary EthnographyHome page
T. Hallett and G. Jeffers
A Long-Neglected Mother of Contemporary Ethnography: Annie Marion MacLean and the Memory of a Method
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, February 1, 2008; 37(1): 3 - 37.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work and OccupationsHome page
G. A. Fine
May I Get the Door for You? An Ethnographic Take on the Labor of Doormen
Work and Occupations, November 1, 2006; 33(4): 417 - 420.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Studies of ScienceHome page
T. F. Gieryn
City as Truth-Spot: Laboratories and Field-Sites in Urban Studies
Social Studies of Science, February 1, 2006; 36(1): 5 - 38.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Contemporary EthnographyHome page
E. E. Wheatley
Risk, Reflexivity and an Elusory Body: Transformations in Studying Illness
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, February 1, 2005; 34(1): 68 - 100.
[Abstract] [PDF]