Journal of Contemporary Ethnography

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schalet, A.
Right arrow Articles by Joe-Laidler, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, Vol. 32, No. 1, 108-143 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0891241602238940
© 2003 SAGE Publications

Respectability And Autonomy

The Articulation and Meaning of Sexuality among the Girls in the Gang

Amy Schalet

University of California at Berkeley

Geoffrey Hunt

Institute for Scientific Analysis

Karen Joe-Laidler

University of Hong Kong

This article explores two different discourses of sexuality among female gang members. Homegirls have long been associated with stereotypes about their sexuality—they are usually portrayed as either too sexual or not (hetero)sexual enough. Yet, in spite of these stereotypes, we know little about how female gang members themselves talk and think about sexuality. In this article, using data from the authors’ ongoing study of street gangs in the San Francisco Bay Area, the authors trace two very different discourses of sexuality among female gang members. The first discourse centers on a modern-day variation of the classic dichotomy between "good" and "bad" girls. A second discourse of "sexual autonomy" stresses the female gang members’ own sexual needs, choices, and actions. Both discourses are not solely about sex per se. They express concerns about a homegirl’s place in the social world of which she is part.

Key Words: sexuality • street gangs • delinquency • gender


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Theoretical CriminologyHome page
D. C. Brotherton
Beyond social reproduction: Bringing resistance back in gang theory
Theoretical Criminology, February 1, 2008; 12(1): 55 - 77.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SexualitiesHome page
C. M. Froyum
'At Least I'm Not Gay': Heterosexual Identity Making among Poor Black Teens
Sexualities, December 1, 2007; 10(5): 603 - 622.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Contemporary EthnographyHome page
E. A. Larsen
A Vicious Oval: Why Women Seldom Reach the Top in American Harness Racing
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, April 1, 2006; 35(2): 119 - 147.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Contemporary EthnographyHome page
E. Sheff
Polyamorous Women, Sexual Subjectivity and Power
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, June 1, 2005; 34(3): 251 - 283.
[Abstract] [PDF]