Journal of Contemporary Ethnography

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Solomon, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, Vol. 32, No. 6, 693-727 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0891241603257605
© 2003 SAGE Publications

A "Know It All" with a "Pet Peeve" Meets "Underdogs" Who "Let Her Have It"

Producing Low-Waged Women Workers in a Welfare-to-Work Training Program

Brenda Solomon

The University of Vermont

While welfare-to-workprograms are put in place and organized by state structures, they occur locally. The program practices designed to ready women receiving welfare benefits for employment are largely negotiated between trainers and trainees meeting together at program sites. In this article, the author draws from the ethnographic data she collected as a participant-observer in a nursing assistant welfare-to-worktraining program and focuses on the informal use of formal class time that the nurse trainer established to address trainee workobstacles. The author’s analysis shows linkages between the trainers and the trainees in terms of their social locations, the problems of workthey faced, and the methods of negotiation they used to meet and resist program goals. The ethnographic data reveal how the trainer and trainees process administrative and subjugated logics, particularly so that "mothering" and "sistering" are used to screen poor women in and out of employment and prepare them for low-waged jobs in the nursing home industry.

Key Words: welfare-to-work • informal processes • frontline workers • institutional ethnography • administrative logic


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Contemporary EthnographyHome page
S. Zaman
Native among the Natives: Physician Anthropologist Doing Hospital Ethnography at Home
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, April 1, 2008; 37(2): 135 - 154.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Contemporary EthnographyHome page
J. Tinney
Negotiating Boundaries and Roles: Challenges Faced by the Nursing Home Ethnographer
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, April 1, 2008; 37(2): 202 - 225.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Contemporary EthnographyHome page
M. R. Dennis
Proletarian or Promethean?: Impacts of Automation and Program Integration on Social Service Workers and Their Clients
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, October 1, 2006; 35(5): 552 - 582.
[Abstract] [PDF]