Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hodson, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

A Meta-Analysis of Workplace Ethnographies

Race, Gender, and Employee Attitudes and Behaviors

Randy Hodson

Ohio State University

Workplace ethnographies suggest many hypotheses about the effects of organizational characteristics on employee attitudes and behaviors. These hypotheses, however, are difficult to evaluate by considering each ethnography individually. The current article uses qualitative comparative analysis of content-coded data from the full population of workplace ethnographies to provide a fuller evaluation of the lessons these ethnographies have to offer. The hypothesis that women are happy and quiescent workers receives only limited support. Women actually evidence less satisfaction and pride in their work than men, but they are more cooperative and less conflictual than men. Autonomy is the most consistent determinant of positive workplace attitudes, a finding that is consistent with survey-based research. These findings thus both confirm and condition prior conclusions about the workplace and suggest the importance of systematically compiling the findings of workplace ethnographies to evaluate and benchmark conclusions based on ethnographic analysis.

Key Words: race • gender • organizations • ethnography • qualitative • comparative analysis

Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, Vol. 33, No. 1, 4-38 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0891241603259808


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qualitative Social WorkHome page
S. S. Al-Makhamreh and G. Lewando-Hundt
Researching `at Home' as an Insider/Outsider: Gender and Culture in an Ethnographic Study of Social Work Practice in an Arab Society
Qualitative Social Work, March 1, 2008; 7(1): 9 - 23.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EthnographyHome page
M. Iszatt-White
Catching them at it: An ethnography of rule violation
Ethnography, December 1, 2007; 8(4): 445 - 465.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Contemporary EthnographyHome page
M. R. Dennis
Proletarian or Promethean?: Impacts of Automation and Program Integration on Social Service Workers and Their Clients
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, October 1, 2006; 35(5): 552 - 582.
[Abstract] [PDF]