This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Crowley, J. E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Friend or Foe?

Self-Expansion, Stigmatized Groups, and the Researcher-Participant Relationship

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

A recurring methodological dilemma for ethnographers studying organizations, interest groups, and social movements is how to gain access and gather data from their members, especially if these organizations are pursuing unpopular goals or are otherwise stigmatized by the public in some way. In the United States, fathers' rights groups believe that they are stigmatized in that they are currently attempting to modify child support and custody laws to be more favorable to men; their critics point out that these gains will come at the expense of the well-being of women and children. This article analyzes the opportunities and challenges faced in conducting observational research on 8 fathers' rights groups, as well as in interviewing 158 of their leaders and members in a larger sample of 26 groups located across the country, both of which occurred from 2003-2004. I argue for the introduction of self-expansion theory—drawn from the field of social psychology—into the ethnographic methodologist's toolbox as a way of mapping out the diverse array of participant reactions to a researcher's request for entrée in studying contentious, marginalized groups.

Key Words: fathers' rights • stigma • self-expansion

References

• Ahmeduzzaman, M. and J.L. Roopnarine. 1992. Sociodemographic factors, functioning style, social support, and father's involvement with preschoolers in African-American families. Journal of Marriage and the Family 54(3):699-707.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Aho, J.A. 1990. The politics of righteousness: Idaho Christian patriotism. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
• Aldous, J., G.M. Mulligan, and T. Bjarnason. 1998. Fathering over time: What makes the difference? Journal of Marriage and the Family 60(4):809-820.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Arditti, J.A. and D. Madden-Derdich. 1997. Joint and sole custody mothers: Implications for research and practice. Families in Society 78(1):36-45.
• Arendell, T. 1995. Fathers & divorce. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
• Arluke, A. 1991. Going into the closet with science: Information control among animal experimenters. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 20(3):306-330.[Abstract]
• Aron, A. and E.N. Aron. 1986. Love as the expansion of self: Understanding attraction and satisfaction. New York: Hemisphere.
• Aron, A., E.N. Aron, and C. Norman. 2001. Self-expansion model of motivation and cognition in close relationships and beyond. In Blackwell's handbook of social psychology, volume 2: Interpersonal processes, edited by M. Clark and G. Fletcher, 478-501. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Aron, A. and T. McLaughlin-Volpe. 2001. Including others in the self: Extensions to own and partner's group members. In Individual self, relational self, and collective self: Partners, opponents, or strangers, edited by M. B. Brewer and C. Sedikides, 89-108. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Bartfeld, J. 2000. Child support and the postdivorce economic well-being of mothers, fathers, and children. Demography 37(2):203-213.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Baskerville, S. 2002. The politics of fatherhood. PS: Political Science and Politics 35(4):695-699.
• Bauserman, R. 2002. Child adjustment in joint-custody versus sole-custody arrangements: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Family Psychology 16(1):91-102.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Bertoia, C. and J. Drakich. 1993. The fathers' rights movement: Contradictions in rhetoric and practice. Journal of Family Issues 14(4):592-615.[Abstract]
• Blankenhorn, D. 1995. Fatherless America: Confronting our most urgent social problem. New York: BasicBooks.
• Blee, K.M. 2000. White on white: Interviewing women in the U.S. White supremacist groups. In Race-ing research: Methodological and ethical dilemmas in field research, edited by F. Winddance Twine and J. Warren, 93-110. New York: New York University Press.
• —. 2002. Inside organized racism: Women in the hate movement. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.
• Blum, N.S. 1991. The management of stigma by Alzheimer family caregivers. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 20(3):263-284.[Abstract]
• Census Bureau, U.S. 2003. America's families and living arrangements: 2003. Annual Social and Economic Supplement, Current Population Series, Current Population Reports, P20-553, and earlier reports.
• Coltrane, S. and N. Hickman. 1992. The rhetoric of rights and needs: Moral discourse in the reform of child custody and child support laws. Social Problems 39(4):400-420.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Crowley, J.E. 2003a. The gentrification of child support enforcement services, 1950-1984. Social Service Review 77(4):585-604.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• —. 2003b. The politics of child support in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• —. 2006a. More than a paycheck? Fathers' rights groups in America. Book Manuscript.
• —. 2006b. Organizational responses to the fatherhood crisis: The case of fathers' rights groups in the United States. Marriage and Family Review 39(1/2):99-120.[CrossRef]
• Crowley, J.E., M. Watson, and M. Waller. 2006. Understanding "power talk:" language, public policy, and democracy. Working Paper.
• Donnelly, D. and D. Finkelhor. 1992. Does equality in custody arrangements improve the parent-child relationship? Journal of Marriage and the Family 54(4):837-845.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Feldman, M.S., J. Bell, and M.T. Berger. 2003. Gaining access: A practical and theoretical guide for qualitative researchers. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
• Fine, G.A. 1993. Ten lies of ethnography: Moral dilemmas of field research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 22(3):267-294.[Abstract]
• Fineman, M. 1991. The illusion of equality: The rhetoric and reality of divorce reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Garfinkel, I. 2001. Child support in the new world of welfare. In The new world of welfare, edited by R.M. Blank and R. Haskins, 442-460. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
• Garfinkel, I., D.R. Meyer, and S.S. McLanahan. 1998. A brief history of child support policies in the United States. In Fathers under fire: The revolution in child support enforcement, edited by I. Garfinkel, S. S. McLanahan, D. R. Meyer, and J. A. Seltzer, 14-30. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
• Goffman, E. 1956. The nature of deference and demeanor. American Anthropologist 58(3):47-85.
• —. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
• —. 1963. Stigma. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• Grall, T. 2003. Custodial mothers and fathers and their child support: 2001. Current Population Reports, U.S. Census Bureau. P60-225.
• Harrington, B. 2003. The social psychology of access in ethnographic research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 32(5):592-625.[Abstract]
• Hennen, P. 2004. Fae spirits and gender trouble: Resistance and compliance among the radical faeries. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 33(5):499-533.[Abstract]
• Hirsch, E. and D.N. Gellner. 2001. Ethnography of organizations and organizations of ethnography. In Inside organizations: Anthropologists at work, edited by E. Hirsch and D. N. Gellner, 1-15. Oxford: Berg.
• Hofferth, S.L. and J. Sandberg. 2001. Changes in American children's time, 1981-1997.. In Children at the millennium: Where have we come from, where are we going?, edited by T. Owens and S. Hofferth, 193-229. New York: Elsevier Science.
• Hogg, M.A. and D. Terry. 2000. Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review 25(1):121-140.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Horn, W.F., D. Blankenhorn, and M.B. Pearlstein. 1999. The fatherhood movement: A call to action. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books.
• Houser, R.A. and M. Domokos-Cheng Ham. 2004. Gaining power and control through diversity and group a filiation. Westport, CT: Praeger.
• Huang, C.-C., J. Kunz, and I. Garfinkel. 2002. The effect of child support on welfare exits and re-entries. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 21(4):557-576.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Johnston, J.R., M. Kline, and J.M. Tschann. 1989. Ongoing postdivorce conflict: Effects on children of joint custody and frequent access. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 59(4): 577-592.
• Major, B. and L.T. O'Brien. 2005. The social psychology of stigma. Annual Review of Psychology 56:393-421.
• May, H. 2000. "Murderers' relatives": Managing stigma, negotiating identity. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 29(2):198-221.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• May, S. 2001. Child custody and visitation. Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law 2(2): 382-401.
• May, T. 2002. Introduction: Transformation in principles and practice. In Qualitative research in action, edited by T. May, 1-14. London: Sage.
• McLaughlin-Volpe, T., A. Aron, S.C. Wright, and G.W. Lewandowski. 2005. Exclusion of the self by close others and by groups: Implications of the self-expansion model. In The social psychology of inclusion and exclusion, edited by D. Abrams, M. A. Hogg, and J. M. Marques, 113-134. New York: Psychology Press.
• Mead, L.M. 1999. The decline of welfare in Wisconsin. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 9(4):597-622.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Messner, M.A. 1997. Politics of masculinities: Men in movements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Mulcahy, A. 1995. "Headhunter" Or "Real cop"? Identity in the world of internal affairs officers. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 24(1):99-130.[Abstract]
• Ocse. 2005. Office of child support enforcement, fiscal year 2004 preliminary report.
• Sayer, L.C., S.M. Bianchi, and J.P. Robinson. 2004. Are parents investing less time in children? American Journal of Sociology 110(1):1-43.[CrossRef]
• Schepard, A.I. 2004. Children, courts, and custody: Interdisciplinary models for divorcing families. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Schur, E.M. 1976. Interpreting deviance: A sociological introduction. New York: Harper and Row.
• Shapiro, A. and J.D. Lambert. 1999. Longitudinal effects of divorce on the quality of the father-child relationship and on fathers' psychological well-being. Journal of Marriage and the Family 61(2):397-408.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Smith, E.R. 2002. Overlapping mental representations of self and group: Evidence and implications. In The social self: Cognitive, interpersonal and intergroup perspectives, edited by J. P. Forgas and K. D. Williams, 21-35. New York: Psychology Press.
• Smith, E.R., S. Coats, and D. Walling. 1999. Overlapping mental representations of self, ingroup, and partner: Further response time evidence and a connectionist model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25(7):873-882.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Smith, E.R. and S. Henry. 1996. An ingroup becomes part of the self: Response time evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22(6):635-642.[Abstract]
• Tajfel, H. 1982. Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Tajfel, H. and J.C. Turner. 1979. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In The social psychology of intergroup relations, edited by S. Worchel and W. Austin, 33-47. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
• Tropp, L.R. and S.C. Wright. 2001. Ingroup identification as inclusion of ingroup in the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27(5):585-600.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Williams, G.I. and R.H. Williams. 1995. All we want is equality: Rhetorical framing in the fathers' rights movement. In Images of issues: Typifying contemporary social problems, edited by J. Best, 191-212. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
• Wright, S.C., A. Aron, and L.R. Tropp. 2002. Including others (and groups) in the self: Self-expansion and intergroup relations. In The social self: Cognitive, intergroup perspectives, edited by J. P. Forgas and K. S. Williams, 343-363. New York: Psychology Press.

Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, Vol. 36, No. 6, 603-630 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0891241606293603


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Crowley, J. E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?