|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Can Bioethics Be Global and Local, or Must it Be Both?
Kaja Finkler*
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Kxf9438{at}email.unc.edu.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
This article contributes to ethnography of bioethical practices in a developing nation by examining how doctors perceive and use them in Mexico. We ask whether principle-based bioethics can transplant to a developing nation. An analysis reveals the bioethical approaches in different hospital settings, the local nature of bioethical understanding, and a universal requirement for ethical distribution of health care. After an overview of U.S. bioethics development and of Mexican biomedical institutions, the article presents field research done on bioethical conceptualizations and practices in two Mexican government hospitals. An analysis of the bioethical dilemmas physicians face and the approaches taken within the society in different institutional venues uncovers the local character of bioethics and the universal bioethical needs, and the intersection between micro and macro processes in hospital health care. While local conditions must guide a physician’s day-to-day ethical practices, a global bioethics is needed to address universal problems experienced in economically developing nations.
First published on February 4, 2008, doi:10.1177/0891241607312484
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 2008;37:155.
A more recent version of this article appeared on April 1, 2008
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
|
|
