This Article Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hoffmann, H. C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Criticism as Deviance and Social Control in Alcoholics Anonymous

The College of Charleston

Emile Durkheim recognized many years ago that all groups—even a "society of saints"—produce deviants. Group members must then come to terms with how to respond to and control those who violate the group's moral order. The Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) meeting offers an interesting context to explore this process. AA members, by their own admission, are far from being "saints," some admitting to adultery, theft, and assault during their active alcoholism. In this article, the author describes the moral order of AA that functions to prevent and create deviant behavior, focusing on AA members’ use of criticism as both a method of social control and a violation of AA's normative system. This seeming contradiction is explained by showing that criticism is a social control strategy available primarily to high-status members, used primarily against lower-status members.

Key Words: Alcoholics Anonymous • Donald Black • criticism • social control • deviant behavior

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?